Frameworks for organizing financial information and transforming raw data into structured insights that support sound investment decisions.
Effective analysis requires multiple layers of examination. Each layer reveals different aspects of the same underlying reality, and synthesis across layers produces richer understanding than any single perspective.
The macro layer examines broad economic conditions: GDP growth trajectories, inflation dynamics, monetary policy stances, and fiscal balances. These factors establish the backdrop against which all other analysis occurs.
South African investors must track both domestic indicators and global conditions that affect capital flows and currency valuations. The interplay between local and international macro factors creates unique complexities requiring dedicated attention.
Between macro conditions and individual companies sits the sector layer. Industry dynamics—competitive intensity, regulatory environment, technological disruption potential—shape returns across entire groups of companies.
Sector analysis identifies which industries benefit from current macro conditions and which face headwinds. It also reveals relative attractiveness within asset classes, guiding allocation decisions before individual security selection begins.
The company layer focuses on individual business quality: competitive advantages, management capability, financial health, and growth prospects. Here, fundamental analysis techniques—ratio analysis, cash flow modeling, competitive positioning assessment—take center stage.
Strong companies can outperform weak sectors, and weak companies can disappoint despite favorable industry tailwinds. Company-level analysis determines which specific securities deserve capital allocation within sectors deemed attractive.
Integration principle: The three layers must align for highest-conviction opportunities. A great company in an attractive sector during favorable macro conditions presents the clearest case. Misalignment—such as a strong company facing macro headwinds—requires position sizing adjustments and shorter holding period expectations.
Markets repeat patterns because human nature doesn't change. Learning to decompose these patterns into their constituent elements enables recognition in new contexts.
Price patterns reflect collective psychology playing out across time. Head-and-shoulders formations, double tops, ascending triangles—these shapes emerge because participants respond similarly to recognizable situations. Understanding the psychology behind patterns matters more than memorizing formations.
Market sentiment oscillates between extremes of pessimism and optimism. These cycles have characteristic shapes and typical durations. Reading sentiment accurately helps identify when consensus has become too one-sided, creating conditions for reversal.
Current situations rarely match historical precedents exactly, but analogies provide useful reference points. Studying how similar conditions resolved previously—while remaining humble about imperfect matches—enriches scenario analysis.
Certain structural arrangements—crowded trades, leverage concentrations, liquidity mismatches—repeatedly create conditions for disorderly adjustments. Recognizing these structures before they unwind provides defensive advantages.
Data visualization transforms abstract numbers into intuitive insights. Well-designed charts reveal patterns and relationships that spreadsheets obscure.
Have analytical approaches that have worked well? Questions about building better decision frameworks? Let's exchange ideas.